Forensic Science International
Volume 196, Issue 1 , Pages 111-117, 20 March 2010

Fatty acid ethyl ester concentrations in hair and self-reported alcohol consumption in 644 cases from different origin

  • Silke Süße

      Affiliations

    • Trimega Drogencheck, Sedanstr. 14, 89077 Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Carl M. Selavka

      Affiliations

    • 9 Hollywood Drive, Charlton, MA 01507, USA
  • ,
  • Tom Mieczkowski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, USA
  • ,
  • Fritz Pragst

      Affiliations

    • University Hospital Charite, Institute of Legal Medicine, Hittorfstr. 18, 14195 Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 12 June 2009; accepted 31 August 2009. published online 11 January 2010.

Abstract 

For diagnosis of chronic alcohol abuse, fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) were determined in hair samples from 644 individuals, mainly parents from child protection cases. The analysis for ethyl myristate, ethyl palmitate, ethyl oleate and ethyl stearate was performed according to a validated procedure consisting of external degreasing by two times washing with n-heptane, extraction with a mixture of dimethylsulfoxide and n-heptane, separation and evaporation of the n-heptane layer, headspace solid phase microextraction of the residue after addition of phosphate buffer pH 7.6 and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry using deuterated internal standards. For interpretation, the sum of the concentrations of the four esters CFAEE was used with the cut-off's 0.5ng/mg for the proximal scalp hair segment 0–3cm or less and 1.0ng/mg for scalp hair samples with a length between 3 and 6cm and for body hair.

CFAEE ranged from 0.11 to 31ng/mg (mean 1.77ng/mg, median 0.82ng/mg). The mean concentration ratio between the 4 esters was 8:45:38:9. 298 cases had CFAEE above the cut-off's. Self-reported drinking data were obtained in 553 of the cases in the categories abstinent (156 cases), moderate drinking (252 cases) and excessive drinking (145 cases). Median and box-plot data clearly demonstrate differentiation of these ingestor sub-populations by CFAEE. However, in the abstinent and moderate groups the consumption was frequently underreported (37 and 110 cases positive) whereas in the group self-reported excessive drinking 32 cases were negative. Comparison of CFAEE with carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) in 139 cases and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in 136 cases showed a good agreement in CDT- and GGT positive cases (27/28 and 32/41) but a large portion of the negative CDT- and GGT-results with positive hair test (44/100 and 48/95) which is explained mainly by the much shorter time window of CDT and GGT.

No significant correlation was found between persons weight and CFAEE showing that the test is not biased against physical fitness or obesity. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between scalp hair (541 samples) and hair from other body sites (84 samples).

In conclusion, FAEE in hair appeared to be suitable markers for the detection of excessive drinking. However, as there is no proportionality between drinking amount and CFAEE, the additional use of other markers can increase the reliability of the interpretation.

Keywords: Alcohol markers, Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT), Fatty acid ethyl esters, Gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), Hair analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0379-0738(09)00530-1

doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.029

Forensic Science International
Volume 196, Issue 1 , Pages 111-117, 20 March 2010