Forensic Science International
Volume 198, Issue 1 , Pages 58-61, 20 May 2010

Urine testing for norcodeine, norhydrocodone, and noroxycodone facilitates interpretation and reduces false negatives

  • Edward J. Cone

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: 441 Fairtree Drive, Severna Park, MD 21146, United States.
  • ,
  • Anne Zichterman

      Affiliations

    • Aegis Sciences Corporation, 515 Great Circle Road, Nashville, TN 37228, United States
  • ,
  • Rebecca Heltsley

      Affiliations

    • Aegis Sciences Corporation, 515 Great Circle Road, Nashville, TN 37228, United States
  • ,
  • David L. Black

      Affiliations

    • Aegis Sciences Corporation, 515 Great Circle Road, Nashville, TN 37228, United States
  • ,
  • Beverly Cawthon

      Affiliations

    • Aegis Sciences Corporation, 515 Great Circle Road, Nashville, TN 37228, United States
  • ,
  • Tim Robert

      Affiliations

    • Aegis Sciences Corporation, 515 Great Circle Road, Nashville, TN 37228, United States
  • ,
  • Frank Moser

      Affiliations

    • Aegis Sciences Corporation, 515 Great Circle Road, Nashville, TN 37228, United States
  • ,
  • Yale H. Caplan

      Affiliations

    • National Scientific Services, 3411 Phillips Drive, Baltimore, MD 21208, United States

Received 3 September 2009; received in revised form 18 November 2009; accepted 1 December 2009. published online 28 December 2009.

Abstract 

Urine drug testing of pain patients provides objective information to health specialists regarding patient compliance, diversion, and concurrent illicit drug use. Interpretation of urine test results for semi-synthetic opiates can be difficult because of complex biotransformations of parent drug to metabolites that are also available commercially and may be abused. Normetabolites such as norcodeine, norhydrocodone and noroxycodone are unique metabolites that are not available commercially. Consequently, detection of normetabolite in specimens not containing parent drug, provides conclusive evidence that the parent drug was consumed.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of the three normetabolites, norcodeine, norhydrocodone and noroxycodone, in urine specimens of pain patients treated with opiates. Urine specimens were hydrolyzed with β-glucuronidase and analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) assay for the presence of codeine, norcodeine, morphine, hydrocodone, norhydrocodone, hydromorphone, dihydrocodeine, oxycodone, noroxycodone, and oxymorphone. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for these analytes was 50ng/mL. The study was approved by an Institutional Review Board.

Of the total specimens (N=2654) tested, 71.4% (N=1895) were positive (≥LOQ) for one or more of the analytes. The prevalence (%) of positive results for codeine, hydrocodone and oxycodone was 1.2%, 26.1%, and 36.2%, respectively, and the prevalence of norcodeine, norhydrocodone and noroxycodone was 0.5%, 22.1%, and 31.3%, respectively. For specimens containing normetabolite, the prevalence of norcodeine, norhydrocodone and noroxycodone in the absence of parent drug was 8.6%, 7.8% and 9.4%, respectively. From one-third to two-thirds of these specimens also did not contain other metabolites that could have originated from the parent drug. Consequently, the authors conclude that inclusion of norcodeine, norhydrocodone and noroxycodone is useful in interpretation of opiate drug source and reduces potential false negatives that would occur without tests for these unique metabolites.

Keywords: Normetabolites, Opiates, Urine, Compliance monitoring

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0379-0738(09)00484-8

doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.005

Forensic Science International
Volume 198, Issue 1 , Pages 58-61, 20 May 2010