Forensic Science International
Volume 198, Issue 1 , Pages 2-6, 20 May 2010

Evaluation of on-site oral fluid screening using Drugwipe-5, RapidSTAT® and Drug Test 5000® for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers

Federal Public Service Justice, National Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology, Vilvoordsesteenweg 100, 1120 Brussels, Belgium

Received 20 August 2009; received in revised form 1 October 2009; accepted 9 October 2009. published online 13 November 2009.

Abstract 

Driving under the influence of drugs is a major problem worldwide. At the moment, several countries have adopted a ‘per se’ legislation to address this problem. One of the key elements in the enforcement process is the possibility of rapid on-site screening tests to take immediate administrative measures. In this study, the reliability of three oral fluid screening devices (Mavand RapidSTAT®, Securetec Drugwipe-5, and Dräger DrugTest 5000®) was assessed by comparing their on-site results with confirmatory GC–MS plasma analysis. Our results demonstrate that for amphetamine screening, the oral fluid on-site devices on the market today are certainly sensitive enough. RapidSTAT®, Drugwipe-5, and DrugTest 5000® demonstrated respectively a sensitivity of 93%, 100% and 92% for amphetamine/MDMA. For cocaine screening, sensitivities of 75%, 78% and 67% were obtained for the RapidSTAT®, Drugwipe-5, and DrugTest 5000® devices, respectively. The studied devices were able to detect about 70% of all cannabis users in a roadside setting. However, a newer version of the DrugTest 5000® test cassette demonstrated a sensitivity of 93%, indicating an increased detection of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol using ‘new generation’ oral fluid screening tests with lowered cut-offs. Due to these promising results police officers and judicial experts are keen to use oral fluid screening devices. They believe that their ease of use and diminished amount of false positive results in comparison with urine screening will lead to more roadside tests and more appropriate juridical measures.

Keywords: Oral fluid screening, Saliva, THC, Driving Impairment, Legislation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0379-0738(09)00423-X

doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.012

Forensic Science International
Volume 198, Issue 1 , Pages 2-6, 20 May 2010