Forensic Science International
Volume 156, Issue 1 , Pages 9-15, 6 January 2006

Application of hypervariable genetic markers to forensic identification of ‘wild’ from hatchery-raised red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus

  • M.A. Renshaw

      Affiliations

    • Center for Biosystematics and Biodiversity, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, TX 77843-2258, USA
  • ,
  • E. Saillant

      Affiliations

    • Center for Biosystematics and Biodiversity, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, TX 77843-2258, USA
  • ,
  • R.E. Broughton

      Affiliations

    • Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, 111 E. Chesapeake Street, Norman, Oklahoma, OK 73019, USA
  • ,
  • J.R. Gold

      Affiliations

    • Center for Biosystematics and Biodiversity, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, TX 77843-2258, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 979 847 8778; fax: +1 979 845 4096.

Received 31 December 2004; received in revised form 2 May 2005; accepted 3 May 2005. published online 15 December 2005.

Abstract 

Forensic identification of ‘wild’ versus hatchery-produced (cultured) red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), an economically important marine fish in the southern United States, was assessed using hypervariable nuclear-encoded microsatellites and sequences of mitochondrial DNA. Both genotype exclusion and likelihood-ratio tests successfully identified ‘wild’ and ‘cultured’ individuals within requisite error bounds and within the context of complete parental sampling. Of the two, genotype exclusion was more effective, producing satisfactory results with fewer microsatellites and larger allowable error rates. Assignment tests proved ineffective, most likely because of the low level of genetic divergence between the sampled populations. An optimal, minimum set of ten markers that will reduce potential genotyping costs is identified. Results of the study should allay concerns regarding identification of ‘wild’-caught fish sold illegally.

Keywords: Microsatellites, Forensic genetics, ‘Wild’ versus hatchery-raised fish

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0379-0738(05)00584-0

doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.05.038

Forensic Science International
Volume 156, Issue 1 , Pages 9-15, 6 January 2006