« Previous
Next »
Forensic Science International
Volume 159, Issue 2
, Pages 104-112
, 2 June 2006
Validation of the Cozart® Amphetamine Microplate EIA for the analysis of amphetamines in oral fluid
References
- . Kinetics, salivary excretion of amphetamine isomers and effect of urinary pH. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1978;23:585–590
- . Quantitative determination of enantiomeric compounds: simultaneous measurement of the optical isomers of amphetamine in human plasma and saliva using chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1977;4(2):118–121
- . Comparison of saliva and urine samples in thin-layer chromatographic detection of central nervous stimulants. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. Res. 1984;4:5–8
- . Clinical pharmacokinetics of amfetamine and related substances: monitoring in conventional and non-conventional matrices. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2004;43:157–185
- . Analysis of methamphetamine in hair, nail, sweat and saliva by mass fragmentography. J. Anal. Toxicol. 1989;13:176–178
- . Methamphetamine and amphetamine pharmacokinetics in oral fluid and plasma after controlled oral methamphetamine administration to human volunteers. Clin. Chem. 2003;49:121–132
- . Excretion of MBDB and BDB in urine, saliva and sweat following single oral administration. J. Anal. Toxicol. 1997;21:570–575
- . Determination of “Ecstasy” components in alternative biologic specimens. J. Chromatogr. B. 1999;7333:137–143
- Usefulness of saliva for measurement of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and its metabolites: correlation with plasma drug concentrations and effect of salivary pH. Clin. Chem. 2001;47:1788–1795
- . Plasma, oral fluid and sweat wipe ecstasy concentrations in controlled and real life conditions. Forensic Sci. Int. 2002;128:90–97
- . The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from an ACASI general population survey. Addiction. 2004;99:197–208
- Amphetamine Microplate EIA Oral Fluid Application, M110R1. Cozart Bioscience Ltd.; 2003;
- . Hair analysis: self-reported use of “speed” and “ecstasy” compared with laboratory findings. J. Forensic Sci. 2000;45(2):400–406
PII: S0379-0738(05)00396-8
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.06.011
© 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Forensic Science International
Volume 159, Issue 2
, Pages 104-112
, 2 June 2006
