Predicting the residential location of a serial commercial robber

References 

1. Lowe JC, Moryadas S. The Geography of Movement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1975;
2. Turner S. Delinquency and distance. In:  Wolfgang ME,  Sellin T editor. Delinquency: Selected Studies. New York: John C. Wiley; 1969;p. 11–26
3. Capone DL, Nichols WW. In: Crime and Distance: An Analysis of Offender Behaviour in Space, Proceedings. Association of American Geographers. 1975;p. 45–49
4. LeBeau JL. The journey to rape: geographic distance and the rapist's method of approaching the victim. J. Police Sci. Adm. 1987;15:129–136
5. Rengert G, Piquero A, Jones PR. Distance decay re-examined. Criminology. 1999;37(2):427–445
6. P. Santtila, M. Laukkanen, K.M. Carlsson, J. Kardell, M. Faggiano, M. Picozzi, et al., How far from home offenders travel: an international comparison of crime trips in homicide, rape, burglary, and robbery cases. Poliisiammattikorkeakoulun tutkimuksia, vol. 18, Police College of Finland, 2004.
7. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL. Notes on the geometry of crime. In:  Brantingham PJ,  Brantingham PL editor. Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1981;p. 27–54
8. White RC. The relation of felonies to environmental factors in Indianapolis. Social Forces. 1932;10:498–509
9. van Koppen PJ, Jansen RWJ. The road to the robbery. Travel patterns in commercial robberies. Brit. J. Criminol. Spring 1998;38(2):
10. Canter D, Larkin P. The environmental range of serial rapists. J. Environ. Psychol. 1993;13:63–69
11. Stea D. The measurement of mental maps: an experimental model for studying conceptual spaces. In:  Cox KR,  Golledge RG editor. Behavioral Problems in Geography. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press; 1969;p. 228–253
12. Kocsis RN, Irwin HJ. An analysis of spatial patterns in serial rape, arson and burglary: the utility of the Circle Theory of environmental range for psychological profiling. Psychiatry Psychol. Law. 1997;4(2):195–206
13. Meaney R. Commuters and marauders: an examination of the spatial behaviour of serial criminals. J. Invest. Psychol. Offender Profil. 2004;1:121–137
14. N. Levine, Journey-to-crime estimation, retrieved 23 October 2003 from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/NACJD/crimestat/CrimeStatChapter.9.pdf, last visited 1 February 2005.
15. Scott DW. Multivariate Density Estimation—Theory Practise and Visualization. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1992;
16. Canter D, Snook B. Modelling the home location of serial offenders. In: Material from the Conference: Expanding the Boundaries: The Third Annual International Crime Mapping Research Conference. Orlando, USA. December 1999;
17. OPTULA, Rikollisuustilanne 2002—rikollisuus tilastojen valossa. Oikeuspoliittinen tutkimuslaitos, Helsinki, 2003 (in Finnish, English Summary: Crime Trends in Finland 2002, National Research Institute of Legal Policy, Finland, 2003).
18. RNT—Rikoksentorjunnan Neuvottelukunnan Työryhmä, Rahalaitos- ja liikeryöstöt. Oikeusministeriön lainvalmisteluosaston julkaisu 7, 1993 (in Finnish, Robberies of Financial Institutions and Businesses, National Council for Crime Prevention, Ministry of Justice, Finland), Helsinki, 1993.
19. N. Levine, CrimeStat: A Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incident Locations (v 2.0), Ned Levine and Associates, Houston, TX/National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, May 2002, 2003.
20. Silverman BW. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 26. Chapman and Hall; 1990;
21. W. Servay, J. Rehm, Bankraub aus Sicht der Täter (English summary), Täterleitende Faktoren bei Raubüberfällen auf Geldinstitute, Wiesbaden, 1986.
22. S. Sillanpää, Aseelliset ryöstöt (available for limited distribution from Helsinki Police Department's Violent Crime/Homicide Criminal Investigation Department, Pasilanraitio 13, 00240 Helsinki, Finland, Europe), 1994 (updated version 1997).
23. Alison L, Rockett W, Deprez S, Watts S. Bandits, cowboys and robins: the facets of armed robbery. In:  Canter D,  Alison L editor. Offender Profiling Series: IV—Profiling Property Crimes. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 1999;p. 75–106
24. Cohen JA. Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 1960;20:37–46
25. Brennan PF, Hays B. The use of the Kappa statistic in the secondary analysis of clinical data. Res. Nurs. Health. 1992;15(2):152–158
26. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. fourth ed.. Allyn and Bacon; 2001;pp. 82–85
27. McCluskey K, Wardle S. The social structure of robbery. In:  Canter D,  Alison L editor. The Social Psychology of Crime. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd.; 2000;p. 247–285
28. Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik. 1959;1:269–271
29. Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C. Introduction to Algorithms. second ed.. MIT Press; 2001;pp. 595–599
30. Downs RM, Stea D. Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. Harper & Row Series in Geography. New York: Harper & Row; 1977;
31. Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW. MMSS: Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Sage Publications; 2002;
32. Rossmo DK. Geographic Profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000;
33. J.D. Kent, Using functional distance measures when calibrating journey-to-crime distance decay algorithms, Thesis, Louisiana State University, Interdepartmental Program of Natural Sciences, 2003.
34. FLINTS, Force Linked Intelligence System, Versions 1–5, West Midlands Police and Forensic Science Service, retrieved 21 January 2005 from http://www.west-midlands.police.uk/flints/flints.htm.
35. Santtila P, Korpela S, Häkkänen H. Expertise and decision-making in the linking of car crime series. Psychology Crime Law. 2004;10(2):97–112Routledge
36. Canter D. Criminal Shadows. UK ed.. London, UK: Harper Collins; 1995;
37. Godwin M. Profiling and linking crimes. In:  Godwin M editors. Criminal Psychology and Forensic Technology: A Collaborative Approach to Effective Profiling. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001;p. 177–206
38. Gabor T, Gottheil E. Offender characteristics and spatial mobility: an empirical study and some policy implications. Can. J. Criminol. 1984;26:267–281
39. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef